Archive for the 'Base Metals' Category

Dec 14 2011

Base Metals Positions – 2011 v. 2008

A short article published on the Commodity Online Blog last Friday afternoon is titled ‘Base metals positioning: What is different in 2011 vis-à-vis 2008’ – reading time 2 minutes – provides brief summaries of market positioning and overviews of the current Aluminum, Copper, Lead, Nickel and Zinc markets as currently perceived by Barclays Capital.  Barclays is said to believe that across the base metals this positioning is quite different than it was in the months leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.  According to Barclays, in 2008 “the market was long and prices were high reflecting bullish sentiment” – which subsequently resulted in reduced prices experienced over a long liquidation period.  As I read this article, Barclay says short positions in many of the base metals today will mitigate against a recurrence of a 2008 type drop in base metal prices (perhaps with the exception of copper and zinc) if a repeat financial crisis is experienced, and existing short positions in the base metals may result in rallies from current prices if there is a ‘market perceived’ reduction in macroeconomic risks going forward.

I see all this as interesting, but more in the context that it has been written as a comparison of market positions between 2008 and now.  That says to me that Barclays, and I assume other market participants given the way I read the article, are concerned about short-term trading positions – as I think well they should be given what is going on in the world.  While from a trading point of view I think macroeconomic day/day events are important, I think a bigger picture and longer-term view with respect to base metal prices are fundamental to investors in base metals equities.  Hence in my view the ongoing importance if one invests/trades in base metals stocks of co-relating on a continuing basis what is going on in the Middle East with respect to the potential impact of that on oil supplies and hence oil prices, and what is going on in China and other developing countries in the context of their prospective economic growth rates.

I anticipate there will be ongoing current news most days on those things, and that much of that may prove to be worth commenting on in these e-mails.

Visit Stock Research Portal for stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining, Oil and Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer.

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Aug 02 2011

Copper Supply & Price

Listen to this commentary
Listen to this commentary

A recent article titled ‘Indefinite strike at Escondida may impact copper prices‘ – reading time 1 minute – reported that about 2,300 workers at BHP’s Chile Escondinda 3,000 tonnes per day copper mine launched an indefinite work stoppage over unresolved disputes.  From my perspective that this has happened is somewhat of a non-event.  However, that at least someone believes that it may impact copper prices is interesting to say the least, and something worth noting.  Simply put, it strikes me that if the output from one copper mine somewhere in the world, irrespective of size, could affect the copper price to the point where it might be material enough to merit mention in the context of a potential copper price increase, that speaks volumes about potential copper supply issues as some future date – akin to ‘peak oil’ issues in the context of oil supply.  This could, of course, also constitute ‘sensationalism reporting’.

Something to think about.

Visit Stock Research Portal for free stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining,Oil and Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer.

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Feb 01 2011

Peak Oil, Caterpillar’s 2010!

Peak Oil

An article this morning titled ‘Welcome, “Peak Oil”‘ – reading time 4 minutes – is one I suggest resource equity investors take the time to read and consider carefully.  Note that neither the article title, nor my own title for this commentary, has a question mark added to the term Peak Oil.  The article’s author sees Peak Oil (where oil demand exceeds oil supply) as inevitable, as do I.  The article suggests that world output of ‘conventional crude‘ peaked in 2005, and that Peak Oil could be upon us as early as 2 -3 years from now.  My caveats to this time frame are (1) I think reversion to recession or depressive conditions in the developed countries (the U.S. and EuroZone countries in particular) in the next 1 – 3 years would extend that time period since demand for oil would drop in such circumstances, and (2) if developing technologies to efficiently extract oil in large quantities from the Canadian Oil Sands prove to be commercially successful in the near term that could go some distance to extend that time period.

In any event, the article’s author (a Hong Kong based money manager) is bullish on the price of both crude oil and uranium, and says he has 30% of his client’s money invested in assets that “will benefit from the looming energy crunch” through exposure to (1) upstream oil companies, (2) integrated energy giants, (3) oil services firms, (4) renewable energy stocks, (5) uranium, and (6) electric car/rechargeable battery manufacturers.

An article worth reading, or so I think.

Caterpillar’s 2010!

Caterpillar Worries About Central Bankers, Global Divergence‘.  I think those of you who trade and invest in resource stocks ought to spend some serious time reading and considering Caterpillar Inc.‘s Q4 2010 Earnings Release – reading time 30 minutes.  You can find it by linking to the WSJ article, and then clicking on the underlined segment offered its extensive forecast for the world economy (in PDF format) found in the article’s first paragraph.  The Wall Street Journal article is a summary of what its author took from Caterpillar’s release – reading time 3 minutes. I strongly suggest you take the time to read both the WSJ article and Caterpillar’s 4th Quarter Release yourself, with particular emphasis on pages 1, 2, 16, 17 and 28 – 30 of the latter.  My comments on the Caterpillar release follow.

Caterpillar is a (if not the) world’s leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, hence my interest in the company as one monitor of the Resources Sectors.  Caterpillar’s 2010 results strike me as highly noteworthy. Measured against 2009, in 2010 its sales were up 31%, and its reported profit was up 202%. Caterpillar added about 19,000 to its world workforce in 2010, to end the year with about 104,000 employees.  About 7,500 of those 19,000 jobs were added in the U.S., representing a 15% increase in the U.S. based workforce.  Based on other disclosures in the Earnings Release I calculate Caterpillar’s U.S. based workforce to have been about 73,000 at the end of 2010, and its ‘outside the U.S. workforce then to have been about 31,000.  If my calculations are correct, this means Caterpillar increased its non-U.S. based workforce in 2010 by just under 60%.  In 2010 Caterpillar announced 8 new plants, 5 of which are outside the U.S.  In 2011 Caterpillar expects make capital expenditures of about U.S.$3 billion, with over half that to be spent in the U.S.

Caterpillar’s sales numbers are interesting. 2009 consolidated sales were (rounded) U.S.$32 billion and increased to U.S.$43 billion in 2010 – largely attributed to increased sales of machinery.  2011 sales are forecast to be over U.S. $50 billion.  I say the sales numbers are ‘interesting’ because they do not reflect what I thought they would.  Caterpillar reports its sales breakdown by four world ‘regions’ – North America, Latin America, Eurozone/Africa/Middle East (EAME), and Asia/Pacific.  I was expecting to see a large proportionate increase in Caterpillar’s 2010 sales in the Asia/Pacific region, but that wasn’t the case.  As a % of Caterpillar’s total sales North America accounted for 38% of sales in both 2009 and 2010, Latin America accounted for 12% in 2009 and 14% in 2010, EAME accounted for 27% in 2009 and 24% in 2010, and Asia/Pacific accounted for 23% in 2009 and 24% in 2010.  Detailed sales information is provided in the Earnings Release.

On pages 16 – 17 of the Release Caterpillar management provides its ’2011 Economic Outlook’.  Highlights include:

·        forecasted world economic growth at more that 3.5%;

·        improvement of construction activity in most countries;

·        expectation that most governments and central banks will regard job creation rather than inflation as the dominant economic issue;

·        2011 average prices for copper, West Texas Intermediate oil, and Central Appalachian (thermal) coal of (U.S.$) 4.25, $92.00 and $72.00 respectively; and,

·        world production of key (I assume ‘base’) metals will increase in a range of from 2% for copper to 9% for iron ore.

Caterpillar management cites economic risks to include:

·        possible ‘too quick’ tightening by developed country Central Banks; and,

·        differences in trade and currency policies that are increasing the potential for ‘trade frictions‘.

Caterpillar is a world business run by experienced and successful managers who can be assumed from operating and business forecasting/planning perspectives be focused every day on the very industries resource investors are focused on.  The Senior Executives of Caterpillar and of its major competitors are dealing ‘hands-on’ with things that I think make both their company results, and their forecasts and prognostications things to be understood and thought about by traders and investors in resource equities.  I hold to this view because I strongly believe that business operators with hands-on experience have knowledge, exposure and ‘real world based’ judgment that technical analysts and ‘high level’ commentators frequently do not have.  Again, I suggest you take 30 minutes of your time to read the Caterpillar Earnings Report.

Additions to Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe

Today we added the following Companies to our Company Universe:

BE Resources Inc. (TSXV:BER).  We currently categorize BE Resources Inc. as a beryllium explorer operating principally in the United States (New Mexico). BE Resources Inc.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$15 million.  Review research data on BE Resources Inc.

Sama Resources Inc. (TSXV:SME).  We currently categorize Sama Resources Inc. as base metals explorer (Copper, Nickel, Gold) operating principally in Africa (Cote d’Ivorie) and the United States (Arizona). Sama Resources Inc.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$20 million.  Review research data on Sama Resources Inc.

Whitecap Resources Inc. (TSX:WCP).  We currently categorize Whitecap Resources Inc. as an oil & gas explorer and producer operating principally in the Canada (Alberta and Saskatchewan). Whitecap Resources Inc.’ s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$265 million.  Review research data on Whitecap Resources Inc.

Press Release Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe who yesterday issued Press Releases and whose shares increased in price from the previous day’s close by more than Cdn$0.05, more than 10%, and whose share volumes yesterday exceeded their trailing 3 month average trading volume.  You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Symbol Sub-Industry Closing Price* Price Change* % Price Change* % Vol / 3 Mths Avg*
TSX:AVK, DB:A1V
Gold
0.53
0.07
14.0 442.9
TSX:DML, TSX:DML.WTA, AMEX:DNN, DB:IUQ
Uranium
3.75
0.37
11.0 114.1
TSXV:GMN, DB:31T
Base Metals
0.86
0.09
11.7 812.3
TSXV:NML, DB:36N
Base Metals
3.70
0.40
12.1 125.1
TSXV:PSL, DB:POU
Silver
0.46
0.06
15.0 120.7

* Yesterday’s data, or latest trading day’s data, as applicable

Insider Trading Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe for who our system yesterday reported insiders who filed reports indicating they had acquired shares through ‘purchase’ transactions.  You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Name Symbol Sub-Industry
TSXV:AIX
Gold
TSXV:SPI, DB:HP4
Focus on Gas
TSX:NGQ, DB:6CG
Gold
TSXV:VR
Gold
TSXV:WER, DB:HN3N, BST:HN3N
Coal – Met

Visit Stock Research Portal for free stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining and Oil & Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Jan 14 2011

Gold & Silver, Food Shortages & Consequences, U.S. Trade Deficits

Gold & Silver

A recent article titled ‘Should You Have Silver in Your Portfolio – As Well As Gold?‘, sub-heading ‘Which is Better to Own – Gold or Silver’ discusses this question under 4 headings: (1) Should We Only Hold Gold?, (2) Should We Only Hold Silver?, (3) What Are Silver’s Major Attributes?’, and (4) How Do Gold and Silver Compare With Each Other? – reading time 4 minutes.  Under the fourth heading the author lists 22 comparators to think about when comparing/contrasting gold and silver. The author concludes the article by saying that he believes both gold and silver “will do well”, but that in the end silver will outperform gold.

I think anyone owning or thinking of owning physical gold or silver (directly, or indirectly through ETF’s, gold or silver certificates, etc.), gold or silver equities, base metals equities with high silver by-product content, or gold or silver royalty or ‘streaming’ equities ought to read this article.  I suspect many of you won’t find ‘much new’, but I found the article to be a good overview and useful review document.  I suggest whether or not you read this article, you reach your own conclusion on the prospective trend direction in the gold and silver prices based on your own conclusion on how the macro-economic scene is likely to unfold over the next 1 -3 years.  From my perspective, the further ‘out in time’ a forecast or prediction, the less weight ought to be put on it – and in the complex and volatile world we live in ‘unexpected events and ‘outliers’ can make any forecast or predication ‘meaningless in a heart-beat’.

Food Shortages & Consequences

I think it worth your while to read an article titled ‘Price Shocks, Food Shortages and Global Economic Riots in 2011?‘ – reading time 4 minutes.  While one might argue that the article sets out a somewhat extreme view, I think it worthwhile to consider that it might not be doing that.  There is little question the world’s population continues to grow exponentially, and that much of the world lives in poverty.  Like many articles generated in America, this article in my view focuses to much on what the factors it cites may mean to Americans.  In my view it is more important to think about what lack of food, bad weather, world population growth, resource prices, etc. may mean on a world scale.  In my opinion a good article to read and think seriously about, irrespective of whether you invest in precious metals and resource equities, and equities generally – although it strikes me that the trends discussed in this article may well bear positively on many commodity prices, and hence on the shares of the companies that produce those commodities.

U.S. Trade Deficits

An article titled ‘Trade Deficit Falls Again‘ reports that the U.S. Net Trade Deficit fell in November by U.S.$110 million from October’s posted number of U.S.$38.42 billion.  A companion article titled ‘Trade Deficit Falls Again, Part II‘ was also published.  The reading time for the first article is 5 minutes, the reading time for the second article is 4 minutes.  I strongly recommend you read both articles.  As you know if you read these e-mails, I consider the U.S. Net Trade Deficits to be an extremely important ‘economic marker‘ of the prospective health and well-being of the U.S. economy.  I commented on the first article this morning as follows:

The author’s statement that: “The Trade Deficit fell in November to $38.31 billion from $38.42 billion in October. The fall in the trade deficit is good news for the economy” can hardly be viewed in my opinion as meaningful. The quoted drop in November from October doesn’t qualify as a ’rounding error’. That said, I agree completely with the author’s statement that: “Getting the trade deficit under control has to be one of the top economic priorities” and have written about this multiple times over the past four years (for example, see my September 11, 2009 commentary on this subject by clicking here).

Try as I might, with U.S. dependence on foreign oil and its post-1999 manufacturing job losses, I don’t see a solution in sight for the U.S. I believe U.S. monthly net trade deficits will continue for the foreseeable future, and the result will be a continuation of world wealth redistribution. My conclusion: (1) U.S. net trade deficits are a fundamental ‘U.S. economic health marker’, and (2) U.S. net trade deficits will continue, and will continually weaken the U.S. economy against the economies of its principal trading partners.

Additions to Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe

Today we added the following Companies to our Company Universe:

Gasfrac Energy Services, Inc. (TSXV:GFS).  We currently categorize Gasfrac Energy Services, Inc. as an Oil & Gas Services company operating principally in Canada (Alberta). Gasfrac Energy Services, Inc.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$525 million.  Review research data on Gasfrac Energy Services, Inc.

Redzone Resources Ltd. (TSX:REZ).  We currently categorize Redzone Resources Ltd. as a gold explorer operating principally in Mexico and South America (Peru). Redzone Resources Ltd.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$25 million.  Review research data on Redzone Resources Ltd.

Southern Andes Energy Inc. (TSXV:SUR).  We currently categorize Southern Andes Energy Inc. as a uranium explorer operating principally in the South America (Peru). Southern Andes Energy Inc.’ s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$25 million.  Review research data on Southern Andes Energy Inc.

Press Release Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe who yesterday issued Press Releases and whose shares increased in price from the previous day’s close by more than Cdn$0.05, more than 10%, and whose share volumes yesterday exceeded their trailing 3 month average trading volume.  You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Symbol Sub-Industry Closing Price* Price Change* % Price Change* % Vol / 3 Mths Avg*
TSX:NIO
Niobium
0.82
0.26
46.4 1,014.6
TSXV:RUU, DB:S82
Uranium
1.70
0.23
15.7 323.4

* Yesterday’s data, or latest trading day’s data, as applicable

Insider Trading Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe for who our system yesterday reported insiders who filed reports indicating they had acquired shares through ‘purchase’ transactions.  You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Name Symbol Sub-Industry
TSXV:BNX.A, TSXV:BNX.B
Focus on Oil
TSXV:CDX
Gold
TSX:DZR, DB:DI9A
Focus on Gas
TSXV:LEA
Oil & Gas Services
TSXV:LFD, DB:70L
Focus on Oil
TSXV:PLY, DB:P1J
Tungston
TSX:PG, DB:P2O, XTRA:P2O
Gold
TSXV:SHY, OTCPK:SHEY.F
Focus on Gas
TSXV:TSU, DB:IEZ, OB:TSU, LSE:0JIA
Focus on Gas

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Next »