Archive for the 'Canadian Oil Sands' Category

Nov 02 2011

Canadian Oil Sands!

A recent article titled ‘The Stranded Oil Sands. A worst-case scenario’ – reading time 4 minutes – discusses the current status (being ‘ongoing discussion’) of the proposed Alberta to Texas Refineries Keystone XL 830,000 barrels/day pipeline. This pipeline is due for start-up (presumably now postponed if approved) in early 2013.  I suggest this is an article worth reading for a summary of what, at least one author thinks, is going on.  What I take from the article is that nothing is happening quickly in the approval process of a pipeline that one industry observer calls “not the only solution, but … a very elegant solution” where “it would really have an impact on the (oil sands) industry (and I assume the oil industry more broadly) if it (the Keystone pipeline) doesn’t proceed in a timely way”.

In the late 1980’s I was engaged as a valuation consultant by counsel to a major pipeline company.  That dispute focused me on the inherent difficulties related to the approval of pipeline ‘right of ways’ – the majority of which relate to potential environmental issues that could arise in the event of a ‘spill’.  I say this because my view at the time, and I have no reason to think things are different now, is that most of the rest of getting pipeline ‘right of way’ approval had to do with monetary disputes over the value of the ‘right of way lands’, or sensitive flora, fauna, and bird and animal species issues which can usually be resolved (often at significant cost) by ‘diverting around’ ecologically sensitive areas.  As best I know, no pipeline can be guaranteed not to rupture, leak through a faulty valve, etc., but also, as best I know, pipelines use ‘state of the art’ technologies that enable careful monitoring of pipeline flows and activity – where if there is a spill or leakage problem it is quickly identified and remedied.

The big issue I see here, which I will be surprised if you have not thought about, is the question of finding an appropriate balance between environmental groups, aboriginal peoples groups, ecological groups, and so on – and practical solutions to the building of projects that are economically important on a country specific and global basis.  This ‘balance issue’ is not, of course, restricted to pipelines.  It has always struck me that small groups of vocal people often carry far more weight in these discussions than their numbers would dictate they ought to, and where their ideas often are loud, and seem unreasonable or are impractical in the context of ‘the greater good’.  Unfortunately, politicians often seem to be unduly influenced by these comparatively small groups – but then ‘re-election focus’ often seems to get in the way of ‘need and practicality’, or so I think.

The Canadian Oil Sands potentially can impact hugely on the American oil dependency issues.  I suggest you take the time to read the referenced article if you are not up to date on the Keystone XL pipeline discussions, as well as issues related to a possible pipeline to Canada’s west coast that would enable better access to Canada’s oil by China and other Asian countries.

You might also want to read ‘TransCanada in compliance on Keystone pipeline’ – reading time 3 minutes.

Visit Stock Research Portal for stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining, Oil and Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer.

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Feb 01 2011

Peak Oil, Caterpillar’s 2010!

Peak Oil

An article this morning titled ‘Welcome, “Peak Oil”‘ – reading time 4 minutes – is one I suggest resource equity investors take the time to read and consider carefully.  Note that neither the article title, nor my own title for this commentary, has a question mark added to the term Peak Oil.  The article’s author sees Peak Oil (where oil demand exceeds oil supply) as inevitable, as do I.  The article suggests that world output of ‘conventional crude‘ peaked in 2005, and that Peak Oil could be upon us as early as 2 -3 years from now.  My caveats to this time frame are (1) I think reversion to recession or depressive conditions in the developed countries (the U.S. and EuroZone countries in particular) in the next 1 – 3 years would extend that time period since demand for oil would drop in such circumstances, and (2) if developing technologies to efficiently extract oil in large quantities from the Canadian Oil Sands prove to be commercially successful in the near term that could go some distance to extend that time period.

In any event, the article’s author (a Hong Kong based money manager) is bullish on the price of both crude oil and uranium, and says he has 30% of his client’s money invested in assets that “will benefit from the looming energy crunch” through exposure to (1) upstream oil companies, (2) integrated energy giants, (3) oil services firms, (4) renewable energy stocks, (5) uranium, and (6) electric car/rechargeable battery manufacturers.

An article worth reading, or so I think.

Caterpillar’s 2010!

Caterpillar Worries About Central Bankers, Global Divergence‘.  I think those of you who trade and invest in resource stocks ought to spend some serious time reading and considering Caterpillar Inc.‘s Q4 2010 Earnings Release – reading time 30 minutes.  You can find it by linking to the WSJ article, and then clicking on the underlined segment offered its extensive forecast for the world economy (in PDF format) found in the article’s first paragraph.  The Wall Street Journal article is a summary of what its author took from Caterpillar’s release – reading time 3 minutes. I strongly suggest you take the time to read both the WSJ article and Caterpillar’s 4th Quarter Release yourself, with particular emphasis on pages 1, 2, 16, 17 and 28 – 30 of the latter.  My comments on the Caterpillar release follow.

Caterpillar is a (if not the) world’s leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, hence my interest in the company as one monitor of the Resources Sectors.  Caterpillar’s 2010 results strike me as highly noteworthy. Measured against 2009, in 2010 its sales were up 31%, and its reported profit was up 202%. Caterpillar added about 19,000 to its world workforce in 2010, to end the year with about 104,000 employees.  About 7,500 of those 19,000 jobs were added in the U.S., representing a 15% increase in the U.S. based workforce.  Based on other disclosures in the Earnings Release I calculate Caterpillar’s U.S. based workforce to have been about 73,000 at the end of 2010, and its ‘outside the U.S. workforce then to have been about 31,000.  If my calculations are correct, this means Caterpillar increased its non-U.S. based workforce in 2010 by just under 60%.  In 2010 Caterpillar announced 8 new plants, 5 of which are outside the U.S.  In 2011 Caterpillar expects make capital expenditures of about U.S.$3 billion, with over half that to be spent in the U.S.

Caterpillar’s sales numbers are interesting. 2009 consolidated sales were (rounded) U.S.$32 billion and increased to U.S.$43 billion in 2010 – largely attributed to increased sales of machinery.  2011 sales are forecast to be over U.S. $50 billion.  I say the sales numbers are ‘interesting’ because they do not reflect what I thought they would.  Caterpillar reports its sales breakdown by four world ‘regions’ – North America, Latin America, Eurozone/Africa/Middle East (EAME), and Asia/Pacific.  I was expecting to see a large proportionate increase in Caterpillar’s 2010 sales in the Asia/Pacific region, but that wasn’t the case.  As a % of Caterpillar’s total sales North America accounted for 38% of sales in both 2009 and 2010, Latin America accounted for 12% in 2009 and 14% in 2010, EAME accounted for 27% in 2009 and 24% in 2010, and Asia/Pacific accounted for 23% in 2009 and 24% in 2010.  Detailed sales information is provided in the Earnings Release.

On pages 16 – 17 of the Release Caterpillar management provides its ’2011 Economic Outlook’.  Highlights include:

·        forecasted world economic growth at more that 3.5%;

·        improvement of construction activity in most countries;

·        expectation that most governments and central banks will regard job creation rather than inflation as the dominant economic issue;

·        2011 average prices for copper, West Texas Intermediate oil, and Central Appalachian (thermal) coal of (U.S.$) 4.25, $92.00 and $72.00 respectively; and,

·        world production of key (I assume ‘base’) metals will increase in a range of from 2% for copper to 9% for iron ore.

Caterpillar management cites economic risks to include:

·        possible ‘too quick’ tightening by developed country Central Banks; and,

·        differences in trade and currency policies that are increasing the potential for ‘trade frictions‘.

Caterpillar is a world business run by experienced and successful managers who can be assumed from operating and business forecasting/planning perspectives be focused every day on the very industries resource investors are focused on.  The Senior Executives of Caterpillar and of its major competitors are dealing ‘hands-on’ with things that I think make both their company results, and their forecasts and prognostications things to be understood and thought about by traders and investors in resource equities.  I hold to this view because I strongly believe that business operators with hands-on experience have knowledge, exposure and ‘real world based’ judgment that technical analysts and ‘high level’ commentators frequently do not have.  Again, I suggest you take 30 minutes of your time to read the Caterpillar Earnings Report.

Additions to Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe

Today we added the following Companies to our Company Universe:

BE Resources Inc. (TSXV:BER).  We currently categorize BE Resources Inc. as a beryllium explorer operating principally in the United States (New Mexico). BE Resources Inc.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$15 million.  Review research data on BE Resources Inc.

Sama Resources Inc. (TSXV:SME).  We currently categorize Sama Resources Inc. as base metals explorer (Copper, Nickel, Gold) operating principally in Africa (Cote d’Ivorie) and the United States (Arizona). Sama Resources Inc.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$20 million.  Review research data on Sama Resources Inc.

Whitecap Resources Inc. (TSX:WCP).  We currently categorize Whitecap Resources Inc. as an oil & gas explorer and producer operating principally in the Canada (Alberta and Saskatchewan). Whitecap Resources Inc.’ s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$265 million.  Review research data on Whitecap Resources Inc.

Press Release Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe who yesterday issued Press Releases and whose shares increased in price from the previous day’s close by more than Cdn$0.05, more than 10%, and whose share volumes yesterday exceeded their trailing 3 month average trading volume.  You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Symbol Sub-Industry Closing Price* Price Change* % Price Change* % Vol / 3 Mths Avg*
TSX:AVK, DB:A1V
Gold
0.53
0.07
14.0 442.9
TSX:DML, TSX:DML.WTA, AMEX:DNN, DB:IUQ
Uranium
3.75
0.37
11.0 114.1
TSXV:GMN, DB:31T
Base Metals
0.86
0.09
11.7 812.3
TSXV:NML, DB:36N
Base Metals
3.70
0.40
12.1 125.1
TSXV:PSL, DB:POU
Silver
0.46
0.06
15.0 120.7

* Yesterday’s data, or latest trading day’s data, as applicable

Insider Trading Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe for who our system yesterday reported insiders who filed reports indicating they had acquired shares through ‘purchase’ transactions.  You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Name Symbol Sub-Industry
TSXV:AIX
Gold
TSXV:SPI, DB:HP4
Focus on Gas
TSX:NGQ, DB:6CG
Gold
TSXV:VR
Gold
TSXV:WER, DB:HN3N, BST:HN3N
Coal – Met

Visit Stock Research Portal for free stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining and Oil & Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Jun 15 2009

Oilwatch Monthly – A Free Newsletter Well Worth Subscribing To!

The following (paraphrased and summarized) is taken from today’s report from Oilwatch Monthly.  Information will next be updated July 15.  ‘Non-OPEC countries produce 60% of world oil production, but the output of those countries is going to ‘fall off its plateau’ in 2010.  More importantly, there currently is an overall decline in investment in oil projects in non-OPEC countries resulting from both suspension and postponement of planned projects.  The results of these things will be large as OPEC gains increasing control and influence over the world’s economy resulting from OPEC, within ‘a couple of years’ being the only group left that can increase oil exports’.  If the commentary in the referenced report is accurate (and I have not independently checked it) it seems to me the implications for the Canadian Oil Sands and natural gas (among other energy sources) may be significant.  The referenced report is replete with charts and data, and I recommend that all readers sign up to this free newsletter and read the report in its entirety.

‘Oilwatch Monthly’ is a free newsletter containing the latest data on oil supply, demand, oil stocks, spare capacity and exports.  I find its narrative and charts particularly well laid out and easy to read.  Readers can view today’s newsletter by clicking here and subscribing to it.  The website is in the Dutch language, the newsletter is in English.  In order to subscribe fill out the name and e-mail address boxes, select ‘Oilwatch Monthly’ from the dropdown, and click the  ‘Schrijf je in’ box.

Click here for the ‘Today’s News’ Economic, Mining and Oil & Gas feature on StockResearchPortal.com.

See Blog Legal Disclaimer

Timely Research on more than 1,600 Canadian Mining and Oil & Gas companies.
Free subscription, click here!

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Jun 02 2009

China National Petroleum Seeks Alliance With Canada

An article titled ‘China’s oil giant seeks alliance with Canada’ says China’s state-controlled energy giant, China National Petroleum Corp., is proposing a strategic alliance with Canada – and particularly Alberta – to help meet its energy needs, while helping Canada develop a new market for its oil. The company said it is seeking the support of Canadian political leaders to help establish a major energy corridor linking Western Canadian supplies to the Chinese market.

As I have said in a number of prior posts, I expect China to aggressively pursue acquisitions and alliances outside of China that it believes strategic to it going forward. Given the size and importance of the Canadian Oil Sands this report does not surprise me. However, it will surprise me if the U.S. does not enter these discussion directly or indirectly. As I see it the Canadian Oil Sands viewed in totality is a ‘world strategic asset’, and accordingly definitely worth ‘fighting over’ if it comes to that.

There is also an article today posted in ‘Today’s News’ on the Home Page of StockResearchPortal.com that focuses on technology developments in the Oil Sands in the context of the environment – a topic I commented on in a blog post in the past few days.

Click here for Oil & Gas Stock Research.

See Blog Legal Disclaimer

Timely Research on more than 1,600 Canadian Mining and Oil & Gas companies.
Free subscription, click here!

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Next »