Archive for the 'Inflation' Category

May 16 2011

David Rosenberg – Inflation/Deflation

If you have 30 minutes to spend with David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff (Toronto), I suggest you listen to a recent interview titled ‘David Rosenberg – Inflation, Deflation or both?‘ – listening time 30 minutes.  In the interview Rosenberg covers the waterfront of inflation, deflation, stagflation, the U.S. economy, and the current equity markets.  I suggest that if you are an investor in equities you will find this interview 30 minutes well spent.  It is in part what I describe as an ‘overview refresher and updater’, but I think the interview includes a lot of useful ‘food for thought’.

Add your comment by clicking here

Visit Stock Research Portal for free stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining and Oil & Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer.

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Apr 26 2011

Economic Scenarios

I strongly suggest you read an article titled ‘How Best to Invest Based on 3 Potential Economic Scenarios‘ – reading time 5 minutes.  It is one of the better short summaries of three possible unfolding world economic scenarios I have seen, those scenarios being (1) Inflationary ‘Recovery’, (2) Stagflationary ‘Debt Trap’ (see my commentary in yesterday’s e-mail), and (3) Global ‘Debt Crisis’.  Each scenario is briefly summarized, and as perceived by the original author the short, near term and longer term ‘expectation/probability’ and ‘suitable investments’ for each scenario are presented in a modified chart format.  I admit to being attracted by this article because it largely conforms with my own thinking in the contexts of both the economic scenarios presented and the expectation/probability time frames suggested.  I found it interesting that in the Global ‘Debt Crisis’ Scenario physical silver is no longer recommended as a suitable investment, whereas it is in the first two economic scenarios.  Physical gold is recommended in all three.  I speculate that the author focused on physical silver’s primary use as an industrial metal when removing it as a suitable investment in his third scenario.

The article is attributed to Frank Suess of MountainVision.com.  Not only do I suggest you read and think carefully about this article, but based on what I consider its quality, I also recommend you visit the MountainVision.com website and consider subscribing to the free articles and newsletters they send.  I did that myself this morning.  MountainVision.com does not seem to have an RSS feed.

Add your comment by clicking here

Visit Stock Research Portal for free stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining and Oil & Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer.

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Apr 25 2011

Inflation – Stagflation?

I think a recent article and a recent video from BoomBustBlog are worth your time.  First, about a week ago an article titled ‘Reggie Middleton on Inflation‘ appeared on that Blog – reading time 5 minutes.  Shortly thereafter an article – reading time 1 minute – with an accompanying video (viewing time 9 minutes) titled ‘Inflation + Deflation = Stagflation – Lower Real Estate Values!‘ appeared on the same Blog.   The first article says – much like I discussed in a recent e-mail – that in the U.S. it is apparent that some interest rates (mortgage rates, 10 year Treasuries) and energy prices are going up, while at the same time consumer affordability of major consumer goods (read ‘houses’) is going down.  Here is my simplistic summary of what has happened, and is currently happening, in the U.S.

·               U.S. unemployment is very high, and higher yet again when those who have given up looking for jobs are factored in;

·               the Main Street U.S. consumer is ‘out of spending gas’.  Concurrently, immediate disposable (food, gasoline) are increasing in price at rates beyond reported the CPI reported inflation rate;

·               average U.S. house prices are at best holding their own, and are dropping in some geographic areas;

·               the prices of commodities (oil, copper etc.  WTI Oil is over U.S.$113 per barrel this morning as I write this) broadly are up, which means that at the input costs for houses, cars, refrigerators, and other big ticket consumable goods is increasing;

·               as inflation in China (read wage increases, overbuilt housing) continues to heat up, even where the Chinese Renminbi (Yuan) appreciates further against the U.S.$ it is likely that prices paid by U.S. consumers for goods made in China will increase and thus be inflationary to those U.S. consumers.  The tables will have turned, and China will be exporting inflation back to the U.S.;

·               QE2 will end, with the largest benefactor in all the U.S. Government subsidization schemes having been the U.S. banking system, not the U.S. consumer or U.S. economy broadly;

·               the Republicans will fight ‘tooth and nail’ on both the upcoming Debt Ceiling Increase debate, and on the September, 2012 fiscal year budget – likely trying to negotiate trade-offs between the two in an attempt to significantly lower the next year’s U.S. Federal deficit; and,

·               the Fed will be hard-pressed to raise interest rates, as to do so will almost certainly slow the U.S. economy further.  In the end, with the Republicans ‘clawing and biting’, I think QE3 is very likely.

Of course, ultimately the U.S. (and every other over-levered country) will have to ‘pay the piper’ and suffer from its past extravagances.  In the meantime, I think the U.S. is more likely headed toward Stagflation than toward Hyperinflation.  I don’t think Fed Chairman Bernanke is correct in thinking that the current inflation attaching to food, oil and other consumables is a ‘temporary phenomena’.  I also don’t think that the same ‘inflation’ that is likely to carry the costs of those consumables higher is going to be reflected in higher housing prices and higher ‘major ticket items’ at the retail level.  This is because the U.S. consumer has a finite amount to spend, and has to eat and pay for basic services, gasoline, clothes, etc. before they buy a ‘high ticket items’ such as houses, cars, or refrigerators.  As I see things, this means the U.S. Main Street consumer won’t be able to afford to pay higher prices for high-priced durable goods, and lack of demand may force the price of these things downward.  If this occurs, it in turn likely would reduce retail and manufacturing margins, which likely would result in more U.S. unemployment, reduced U.S. government tax revenues, increased U.S. Federal deficits, etc. – in other words, an environment would exist where non-durable goods inflation and durable goods deflation would occur concurrently.  As I understand things this would constitute a ‘stagflation environment’, not an attractive prospect.  For reference, ‘stagflation’ can be broadly is defined as: ‘a period when the inflation rate is high, and the economic growth rate is low’ or, alternately, ‘a period when an economy is stagnant while inflation is rising’.

One bright note:  I suspect it will be a good thing to own residential high-rise apartment buildings, buildings those who have lost and subsequently lose their houses will migrate to.  Everyone needs a roof over their head, and apartment rents may be ‘bid up’ as the U.S. economy moves forward.

I wrote about stagflation in an e-mail about ten days ago.  Two Subscribers (both who I know, and whose views I respect) wrote to me and told me I was wrong.  Essentially both said ‘inflation is inflation’, and that is what the U.S. was going to experience going forward.  I urge you to read and watch the Middleton article and video, and then comment on my Stagflation conclusion either by clicking the following link – or by writing to me at info@stockresearchportal.com.

Add your comment by clicking here

Visit Stock Research Portal for free stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining and Oil & Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer.

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Apr 20 2011

Gold – Inflation Hedge?

An article this morning asks (and I think answers) the question ‘Is Gold Really An Inflation Hedge?‘ – reading time 3 minutes.  The article includes charts comparing the price of physical gold with year/year U.S. inflation, with University of Michigan U.S. inflation expectations, and with the U.S. Federal Reserve Balance Sheet.  The article concludes that the evidence shows the gold price increase of the past 11 years (gold breached U.S.$1,500 this morning for the first time, trading at just under U.S.$1,505 as I write this at 7:00 a.m. ET) can’t be attributed solely to inflation, and says “It is key to understand that the exposure you obtain from buying/selling gold is not exclusively linked to the inflation rate”, and that “the fundamental reason gold has value is that it is an alternative to paper currency, and what makes gold attractive to hold vs. a paper currency is what it yields on a real basis”.  My comments:

·               first, I agree that inflation and prospective inflation forecasts are but one factor reflected in the price of physical gold at any given point in time – and from my perspective is far from the most important factor.  Moreover, to adopt only U.S. inflation rates in an analysis is very ‘U.S. centric’.  While the physical gold price typically is quoted in U.S.$, physical gold is a world commodity, not a U.S. commodity.  Accordingly, the more apt inflation comparison would be world inflation, if such a statistic was available;

·               second, while real yields and prospective real yields also bear on the price of physical gold at a given point in time, I see physical gold being little more or less than a ‘safe haven’ purchasing power hedge against uncertain prospective economic times.  ‘Uncertain prospective economic times’ at the moment include Sovereign Debt concerns (including those of the U.S.), ongoing societal unrest in the Middle East and other countries, inflation concerns, etc., etc.   As I have said many times in these e-mails, viewed in isolation the price of physical gold is not so important to me on any given day.  What is important to me is what I have come to believe is the sustainable purchasing power of physical gold in either bad or good world economic times.  Again, and this is important, the price of physical gold and physical silver at any point in time is of paramount importance to the value of gold and silver stocks (be they explorers or producers).

Silver is also up again this morning (U.S.$0.84 to U.S.$44.77 as I write this at 7:19 a.m. ET).  Is silver going up to fast?  You might want to listen to a 4 minute video interview of Jim Rogers talking about gold and silver under the heading ‘Jim Rogers Comments On Triple Digit Silver And Issues Warning: “Parabolic Moves Always Collapse“.  Rogers is head of Rogers International Commodities Fund.  He comments regularly on gold, silver and other monetary and economic matters.  He is easy to listen to, easy to understand, and from my point of view brings common sense and objectivity to his commentaries.  I suggest you spend 4 minutes with Rogers today by clicking on the link to this interview.

Postscript:  I have long said in these e-mails that China will not be happy if the U.S. devalues its currency leaving China ‘holding the bag’ as it were given China’s large U.S.$ holdings.  You might also want to read a brief article – reading time 1 minute – titled ‘China Urges U.S. to Protect Creditors After S&P Warning‘.  I see this comment by China as ‘tip of the iceberg stuff’ if the U.S. pursues any virulent form of U.S. currency debasement – but given the U.S.’s debt and continuously increasing debt position I don’t know how the U.S. can get out of its fiat currency dilemma without doing making one or more major policy decisions in the next few months – or until Washington finally ‘gets it’ that deferment of its debt and annual deficit problems won’t solve anything.

Add your comment by clicking here

Visit Stock Research Portal for free stock market data, analysis, and research on over 1,600 Mining and Oil & Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges. See our Legal Disclaimer.

Possibly Related Posts:


One response so far

Next »