Archive for the 'Structural Unemployment' Category

Jan 20 2011

Interesting Article Quantity, Liebig’s Law, U.S. Initial Jobless Claims, The Great Unknown

Interesting Article Quantity

While much of whether I find an article interesting and think worth commenting on is like beauty, in ‘the eye of the beholder’, I have been seeing over the past week a remarkable increasing in the number of articles that I now have in my ‘backlog’ of topics I plan to comment on. What I think I am seeing is an increasing concern on the part of some commentators as to the near-term state of world ‘economic affairs’, and a widening and polarization of the differences between positive and negative attitudes among writers, commentators, and pundits with respect to the future of U.S. economic recovery, the Eurozone sovereign debt difficulties, potential China economic issues, prospective commodity prices, the prospective physical gold price, etc. etc.

If I am right in that, and the widening and polarizing ‘attitude gap’ I think I am seeing manifests itself in stock, commodity price, and money market activity, I think we may see increasing volatility in those markets in the near-term. Just today, the price of physical gold is down U.S.$25 to U.S.$1,345 as I write this, and the price of physical silver is down U.S.1.30 to U.S.$27.50 – ostensibly as a result of things such as an increase in the Brazilian interest rate, overnight bearish economic data from China, and technically related selling pressure. Technical selling in a declining market as a factor in a sizeable physical gold price drop makes sense to me. A 50 basis point increase in the Brazilian interest rate and ‘bearish’ economic data from China both make less sense to me as significant gold price ‘one day drivers’.

Liebig’s Law

A recent article titled ‘Structural Unemployment in America and Liebig’s Law‘ – reading time 2 minutes – doesn’t really discuss Structural Unemployment but does discuss Liebig’s Law which it states as: “growth is controlled not by the total of resources available, but by the scarcest resource (limiting factor)”. To me this is a different way of stating the old adage that ‘a chain is only as strong as its weakest link’.

While the article does not discuss Structural Unemployment directly, I assume the author is attempting to make the point that he believes Structural Unemployment exists in the U.S. – and that this will curb what otherwise might be U.S. economic growth. As readers of these e-mails know, I believe the U.S. suffers from Structural Unemployment, and consider that to be a very ‘weak link‘ in the U.S. economic ‘chain’.

The ultimate point of this comment is that I suggest you focus on the ‘weakest link‘ principle, whether you are contemplating prospective macro-economics, the prospective price of any particular commodity, or the investment or trading potential of any given commodity, resource equity, or other equity.

U.S. Initial Jobless Claims

The U.S. Department of Labor issues its Initial Jobless Claims report weekly (or in the past many months one might say ‘weakly’) on Thursday at 8:30 ET each week, reporting on the previous week’s initial claims. This morning the U.S. initial jobless claims report came in at 404,000 for the week ended January 15, down 37,000 from the week ended January 8 reported last week. The four week moving average changed downward from 415,750 to 411,750. This has been reported this morning as ‘good news’. From my perspective the moving average (I think, as do others, the better gauge of improvement or deterioration) is not much of a change, and so I for one don’t place much weight on such comparatively minor weekly fluctuations – and so far am not seeing meaningful employment changes in the U.S. Read ‘Initial jobless claims drop by 37,000‘ – reading time 2 minutes.

The Great Unknown

I think a recent article from The Economist titled ‘The great unknown’, sub-titled: ‘Can policymakers fill the gaps in their knowledge about the financial system?‘ is well worth reading and thinking about – reading time 2 minutes – thinking time, more than 2 minutes.

Three years ago, when I first started writing blog posts and e-mails, I commented on the ever, increasing complexity of the economic and financial world by suggested that the simple agrarian life lead by most people before the advent of the automobile was one in which the economic interactions of each small ‘rural economy’ was generally understood at a ‘working level’ by the those who lived in that economy. I went on to trace the development of provincial (state) and federal governments and their respective increasing interference with, and influence on, those small ‘rural economies’ and how those small rural economies began trading outside their own economy in an ever increasingly complex and ‘hard to get one’s head around’ (1) national economy (where at least the ideology can be assumed to be consistent, or largely consistent), and (2) globalization (particularly in the past 10 years) where the ideologies, value systems, rules and regulations are in some cases quite disparate between and among countries.

I suggest you read The Economist article and think about what it says carefully. In essence, as I read the article it says that while policymakers have vast arrays of data at their respective fingertips, they suffer from “vast gaps in knowledge” with respect to the ever-evolving national and international financial systems. I have long believed that, and consider it something to think about hard as we all move forward. Decisions made from an inadequate knowledge base, or by people who have access to knowledge but are not fully informed or necessarily competent to make good decisions, are decisions that prove to be good ones at least in part by happenstance. Something to think about as you follow media reports, and observe decisions made by elected representatives – regardless of country, state, province, or municipality.

Q&A Forums

Two recent Stock Research Portal Question/Answer Forums Posts you might find interesting are:

  • United States Economic Forum: Is the US Federal Reserve really printing money? There is one Answer to date – read it here.
  • Investment Education Forum: What is meant by “arms length operation”, “due diligence” and “a going concern”? There is one Answer to date – read it here.

I encourage our Subscribers to contribute to our over 1,600 Educational and Company Forums. If you are a Subscriber to Stock Research Portal and have not as yet registered to contribute create your Q&A Forums Profile.

Additions to Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe

Today we added the following Companies to our Company Universe:

Auriga Gold Corp. (TSXV:AIA). We currently categorize Auriga Gold Corp. as a gold explorer operating principally in Canada (Manitoba). Auriga Gold Corp.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$11 million. Review research data on Auriga Gold Corp. (Note: market capitalization according to the TSX is Cdn$11 million, our data feed currently reports Cdn$2.7 million. We have reported this to our third-party data provider and expect our feed to be corrected later today or tomorrow)

URSA Major Minerals Incorporated (TSX:UMJ). We currently categorize URSA Major Minerals Incorporated as a base metals producer operating principally in Canada (Ontario). URSA Major Minerals Incorporated’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$11 million. Review research data on URSA Major Minerals Incorporated.

Veraz Petroleum Ltd. (TSXV:VRZ). We currently categorize Veraz Petroleum Ltd. as an oil & gas explorer and producer operating principally in South America (Peru). Veraz Petroleum Ltd.’ s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$22 million. Review research data on Veraz Petroleum Ltd.

Press Release Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe who yesterday issued Press Releases and whose shares increased in price from the previous day’s close by more than Cdn$0.05, more than 10%, and whose share volumes yesterday exceeded their trailing 3 month average trading volume. You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Symbol Sub-Industry Closing Price* Price Change* % Price Change* % Vol / 3 Mths Avg*
Corsa Capital Ltd. TSXV:CSO, DB:4RC Gold 0.90 0.10 12.5 195.7
Huakan International Mining Inc. TSXV:HK, DB:MQJA Gold 0.95 0.09 10.5 135.1
Metalex Ventures Ltd. TSXV:MTX, DB:KWY1 Diamond 0.68 0.08 13.3 338.5
Premium Exploration, Inc. TSXV:PEM, DB:43P Gold 0.51 0.07 14.6 1,135.4

* Yesterday’s data, or latest trading day’s data, as applicable

Insider Trading Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe for who our system yesterday reported insiders who filed reports indicating they had acquired shares through ‘purchase’ transactions. You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

Company Name Symbol Sub-Industry
Belo Sun Mining Corp OTCPK:VNNH.F, TSXV:BSX, DB:VE7 Gold
Cedar Mountain Exploration Inc. TSXV:CED Gold
Diaz Resources Ltd. TSX:DZR, DB:DI9A Focus on Gas
Inspiration Mining Corp. TSX:ISM, DB:OI8 Base Metals
Logan Resources Ltd. TSXV:LGR Gold
Redhawk Resources Inc. TSXV:RDK, DB:QF7 Base Metals

 

See Blog Legal Disclaimer | Visit Stock Research Portal for Mining and Oil & Gas Company Research

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet

Jan 04 2011

Economics Lesson, Structural Unemployment Revisited

Economics Lesson (Two Hours)

One of my sons sent me the link to a two hour video that records a speech given by James G. Rickards of Omnis Inc, a U.S. private company “designed to be a community where highly talented researchers, engineers and other experts could develop innovative solutions to the problems that most concern the U.S. intelligence, defense and national security community”.  Mr. Rickards is Senior Managing Director for Market Intelligence at Omnis, Inc. and co-head of the firm’s practice in Threat Finance & Market Intelligence.  His Omnis website profile describes him as a seasoned counselor, investment banker and risk manager with over thirty years experience in capital markets including portfolio management, risk management, product structure, corporate finance, regulation and operations.

I can assure you I have never taken the time to listen to and watch segments of a two hour video before.  Usually 15 minutes is my maximum attention span.  That said, I spent two hours on New Year’s Day doing just that.  Based on my assessment of this video I would say I have seldom been more impressed with the ‘easy to understand’ manner in which Mr. Rickards communicates the data he presents, and the objectivity he brings to the table.  His ‘seminar’ was given on December 10, 2010 to an audience convened by the John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

Often I say in my e-mails ‘I suggest’ or even ‘I strongly suggest’ you read or watch something.  In this case, if you are an investor in the broad equity markets, or are primarily an investor in resource equities and/or physical gold,  I am going to go beyond ‘strongly suggest’ to say you are making a mistake if you don’t spend two hours with Mr. Rickards – time commitment two hours.  If you do that and disagree, please write to me and tell me that.

Structural Unemployment Revisited

In my December 20, 2010 e-mail I discussed ‘Structural Unemployment’ in some detail.  For those who have not read that e-mail, Structural Unemployment means that in  given economic geography (read country for purposes of this discussion) there is a meaningful mismatch between the skill-sets of unemployed workers or where they live, and the skill-sets required to fill available jobs and where those jobs are located.  I believe given the demographics (age groupings, physical locations, nature of jobs lost to date, and the nature of likely replacement jobs) the U.S. almost certainly currently suffers from Structural Unemployment.  I think that whether or not the U.S. suffers from Structural Unemployment is a hugely important issue.  This is because even if a meaningful number of long-term jobs are created in the U.S., it will take longer to fill them if Structural Unemployment does exist than if it doesn’t – which in turn will result in protracted high unemployment rates.  A January 3 New Yorker Article titled ‘The Jobs Crisis‘ says that while “the structural argument sounds plausible” “there’s surprising little evidence for it”.  As I read the article, its author’s rationale is that if there is Structural Unemployment in the U.S. today one would expect job losses to be “concentrated in a few industries”, one would expect a lot of job vacancies in industries “having trouble finding enough qualified workers”, and neither is the case.

My reaction to this:

  • to a large degree, job losses have been concentrated in the manufacturing and housing industries – with manufacturing job losses having occurred to a large degree after 1999, and housing job losses having occurred largely after 2007 – so there has been significant U.S. ‘job loss concentration’ ; and,
  • job vacancies are a function of demand for goods and services offered by employers, funding of sustaining and growth capital by those employers, and employer determined risk-thresholds that are time specific in circumstances where employers are not creating large numbers of meaningful long-term jobs because in their collective view one or more of those criteria are not being met.  I think that to say there are not enough job vacancies to support a conclusion there is Structural Unemployment in the U.S. is academic, not practical, and not a correct foundation upon which to base a conclusion the U.S. currently doesn’t suffer from Structural Unemployment.

It appears the issue of U.S. Structural Unemployment is increasingly being talked about.  I suggest you read everything you can about it – the pros and cons as to its existence – and reach your own opinion.  I have read and thought carefully and objectively about The New Yorker article.  I haven’t changed my opinion that the U.S. suffers from Structural Unemployment.  I suggest you read the article – reading time 4 minutes.  I then suggest you consider re-reading my December 20 e-mail – 2 minutes to read my comments on Structural Unemployment – and then think hard about this topic.  From my perspective issue of Structural Unemployment definitely will affect prospective U.S. Unemployment positively (if it doesn’t exist), or negatively (if it does exist), from what it otherwise will be.

Two readers of these e-mails are responsible for this further Structural Unemployment commentary.  The first brought The New Yorker Article to my attention.  The second exchanged e-mails with me and included helpful commentary on his views with respect to this issue.  Thanks to both of them.

Additions to Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe

Today we added the following Companies to our Company Universe:

Auryx Gold Corp. (TSX:AYX). We currently categorize Auryx Gold Corp. as a gold exploration company operating in Europe (Spain). Auryx Gold Corp.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$150 million. Review research data on Auryx Gold Corp.

Extorre Gold Mines Limited (TSX:XG). We currently categorize Extorre Gold Mines Limited as a gold (and silver) exploration company operating in South America (Argentina). Extorre Gold Mines Limited’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$585 million. Review research data on Extorre Gold Mines Limited.

Lithium Americas Corp. (TSX:XG). We currently categorize Lithium Americas Corp. as a lithium (and potash) exploration company operating in South America (Argentina). Lithium Americas Corp.’s current market capitalization is approximately Cdn$140 million. Review research data on Lithium Americas Corp.

Press Release Highlights

The following table summarizes the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe who on December 31 and 30 (the latest two TSX/TSXV trading days prior to today) issued Press Releases, and whose shares increased in price from the previous day’s close by more than Cdn$0.05, more than 10%, and whose share volumes yesterday exceeded their trailing 3 month average trading volume. You can research each of these companies by clicking on the company name in the table.

December 31 and December 30 2010

Company Sub-Industry Closing Price* Price Change* % Price Change* % Vol / 3 Mths Avg*
Alberta Star Development Corp. Uranium 0.56 0.08 15.5 127.3
Moly Mines Ltd. Molybdenum 1.35 0.23 20.5 756.9
Vantex Resources Ltd. Gold 0.38 0.14 58.3 1,092.0

Insider Trading Highlights

The following tables summarize the companies in Stock Research Portal’s Company Universe whose insiders on December 31 and 30 (the latest two TSX/TSXV trading days prior to today) reported open market share purchase transactions. You can review each such insider transaction by clicking on the company name in the tables.

December 31, 2010

Company Name Sub-Industry
Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. Gold
BNP Resources Inc Focus on Oil
Canadian Mining Company, Inc Gold
Canadian Natural Resources Limited Focus on Gas
Canadian Spirit Resources Inc. Focus on Gas
Dejour Enterprises, Ltd. Focus on Oil
Endurance Gold Corp. Gold
North Atlantic Resources Ltd. Gold
St. Eugene Mining Corp. Ltd. Base Metals
Starcore International Mines Ltd Gold
Strathmore Minerals Corp. Uranium
Waldron Energy Corporation Focus on Gas

December 30, 2010

Company Name Sub-Industry
Argosy Energy Inc. Focus on Gas
Bannerman Resources Limited Uranium
Brigadier Gold Ltd. Gold
Cedar Mountain Exploration Inc. Gold
Duran Ventures Inc. Base Metals
Endurance Gold Corp. Gold
Gold Canyon Resources Inc. Gold
Mandalay Resources Corp. Base Metals
Marksmen Energy Inc. Focus on Oil
Maxim Resources Inc. Oil & Gas
North Atlantic Resources Ltd. Gold
Osisko Mining Corporation Gold
Phoenix Technology Income Fund Income Trust, Service
Senator Minerals Inc. Base Metals
ShaMaran Petroleum Corp Focus on Gas
Strathmore Minerals Corp. Uranium
Titan Uranium Inc. Uranium
Western Potash Corp. Potash

Possibly Related Posts:


No responses yet